The Folly of Resentment

Eight days ago, on a cold spring morning, as office workers were greeting each other around coffee machines, homemakers were clearing breakfast tables, and schoolchildren were opening their primers, Cho Seung Hui murdered 32 people before killing himself.

What drove Cho to destroy 33 people in the worst gun slaughter in America’s history? Resentment. Rambling about others’ Mercedes and trust funds, Cho left behind verbal and written documentation of the envy that corroded his heart. His self-congratulatory “manifesto” also exposes Cho’s belief that he was justified in destroying those he resented.

Cho’s case was extreme, but the moralizing-wrapped resentment that drove him to destroy himself and others, the failure to look inward for the sources of problems, and the lack of understanding that greatness cannot be achieved by tearing others down plagues every human heart and frequently finds its object in the economic fortunes of others.

The resentment that led Cho to commit violence leads others to impose discriminatory law against the objects of their envy. While Cho violated the right to life of those he hated for what he believed to be their greater wealth, redistributionary fiscal policy, fueled by the same covetousness, violates the right to property. And as Cho destroyed himself, those who sponsor resentment-based fiscal policies damage themselves and all society, both economically and morally.

Did you enjoy this post? Sign up for monthly recipes, coupon codes, travel tips, and more delivered straight to your in-box!

* indicates required

View previous updates.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

We use Mailchimp as our email service. That means that the information you provide will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing when you click the button below. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

1 thought on “The Folly of Resentment

  1. The secular media conspired with all the students who knew Cho to keep this all neat and tidy. Their conclusion: No one knows why he did it; we can’t know why because he wasn’t rational; it was just a few mis-firing synapses in his brain… no room for ENVY or any of the other seven deadly sins. Since spiritual realities like sin don’t exist for the media, both Cho and all the VT students are sinless. They all have halos.

Comments are closed.